A new analysis of public data from Anthropic’s Project Glasswing has highlighted a significant gap between the number of vulnerability findings generated by its Claude frontier model and those that ultimately prove to be real, serious, and worth fixing.
The distinction matters because it suggests that the bottleneck in vulnerability research may increasingly lie in validating new flaws and coordinating their remediation rather than in discovering them.
Barely 10% Have Made It to Disclosure Stage
Patrick Garrity, a security researcher at VulnCheck, recently analyzed Anthropic’s Vulnerability Disclosure Ledger, which is a public record tracking Project Glasswing-related findings as they move through the vulnerability disclosure and remediation process. The analysis showed that Anthropic’s Claude Mythos generated a total of 26,153 vulnerability findings across numerous software projects since Project Glasswing’s launch in April 2026.